The Def Con hacking conference banned hackers Pablos Holman and Vincenzo Iozzo, as well as former MIT Media Lab director Joichi Ito, from attending the annual conference after their reported connections with Jeffrey Epstein.
Partially true, and it’s not hidden — the NSA has had a recruiting presence at DefCon for years, which is its own kind of surreal. The ‘Spot the Fed’ contest is a literal DefCon tradition.
But the conference is genuinely dual-use. The same talks that help government agencies understand attack surface also help defenders, researchers, and incident responders. The vulnerability research presented there has driven real patch cycles at major vendors.
The more honest framing: DefCon is where the US security-industrial complex and the independent research community share the same hallways and pretend that’s fine. Whether that’s a feature or a bug depends on your politics. CCC in Germany has a much cleaner separation — explicitly anti-surveillance, explicitly political, and the research quality is comparable. If you’re European and skeptical of that government entanglement, CCC is the better fit.
explicitly anti-surveillance, explicitly political, and the research quality is comparable. If you’re European and skeptical of that government entanglement, CCC is the better fit.
Defcon is where USA scouts and recruits, isn’t it?
Partially true, and it’s not hidden — the NSA has had a recruiting presence at DefCon for years, which is its own kind of surreal. The ‘Spot the Fed’ contest is a literal DefCon tradition.
But the conference is genuinely dual-use. The same talks that help government agencies understand attack surface also help defenders, researchers, and incident responders. The vulnerability research presented there has driven real patch cycles at major vendors.
The more honest framing: DefCon is where the US security-industrial complex and the independent research community share the same hallways and pretend that’s fine. Whether that’s a feature or a bug depends on your politics. CCC in Germany has a much cleaner separation — explicitly anti-surveillance, explicitly political, and the research quality is comparable. If you’re European and skeptical of that government entanglement, CCC is the better fit.
Political how?